PROTECTION OF THE RURAL DESTINATIONS AS THE WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES: INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article discusses the concept of “agrоcultural (agricultural) heritage” and composing it objects in rural (agricultural) tourism, for which they are the most important destinations. This research object is interdisciplinary, affecting a variety of spheres, particularly, agroourism, sightseeing, services and so forth, and economy in general. Agricultural heritage includes tangible objects of agricultural and technical culture, created for the production. Such objects are saved for better and complete study and understanding of their nature, not for contemplation; they are not works of art. This heritage is anthropogenic and technological. From the scientific and methodological point of view the very understanding of the term of "agricultural heritage" is still quite uncertain. The article presents a comprehensive understanding of it based on the nature-use concept as a binary object system "Man - Nature". The available experience of classification of agricultural heritage objects is considered. Starting 2002, at the initiative of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) the criteria are developed and an inventory of objects of the world agro- cultural heritage, Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), is conducted. One of the GIAHS goals is identifying objects of agricultural heritage that are most corresponding to the status of "global agricultural heritage" and their promotion for including to the UNESCO World Heritage List. The article presents for the first time ever full GIAHS list in Russian as of October, 2016. We have separated in special list 114 objects from 58 countries, corresponding in our view to the concept of "agricultural heritage" from the UNESCO World Heritage List current at the end of 2016. The article presets the attempt to classify them by 12 categories. The rating of countries in the world by the number of Agricultural UNESCO World Heritage Sites is submitted. The author notes that exactly this category of objects forms a primary resource base for the agricultural (rural) tourism development as the most important attractive destinations, especially in Europe. As the conclusions the reasons are formulated, under which agricultural tourism is a promising form of tourism organization both for individual agricultural enterprises on the basis of objects of agricultural heritage, and for the regions in which these objects are presented.

Keywords:
Agricultural Heritage, the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Initiative, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, classification of the objects of agricultural heritage, agricultural (rural) tourism
References

1. Aleksandrova A.Yu., Aigina E.V. Tourism vector in cultural heritage actualization // Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism: Current Challenges]. 2016. Vol.10. No.2. Pp. 19-28. DOI: 10.12737/19500.

2. Afanasiev O.E., Volkhina V.V. The role, significance and functions of skansen as a tourism resource of territory and representants of national traditions of nature-use // Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism: Current Challenges]. 2015. Vol.10. No.3. Pp. 12-22. DOI: 10.12737/14527.

3. Аfanasiev О.Е. Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity: The role and function in tourism // Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism: Current Challenges]. 2016. Vol.10. No.3. Pp. 7-17. DOI: 10.12737/21095.

4. Altieri M.A., Koohafkan P. Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): extent, significance, and implications for development // GIAHS Second international workshop and steering committee meeting. United Nation Food and Agriculture Organization: 7-9 June 2004. Rome: UN-FAO, 2004. Pp. 1-44.

5. Altieri M.A., Koohafkan P. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems: A Legacy for the Future. Rome: UN-FAO, 2011. 42 p.

6. Daugstad K., Roningen K., Skar B. Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgments – A Norwegian perspective in international context // Journal of Rural Studies. 2006. No.22. Pp. 67-81.

7. Dela-Cruz M.J., Koohafkan P. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems: A shared vision of agricultural, ecological and traditional societal sustainability // Resources Science. 2009. Vol.31. No.6. Pp. 905-913.

8. Min Q., He L., Zhang D. Agricultural Heritage Research in China: Progresses and Perspectives // Journal of Resources and Ecology. 2011. Vol.2. No.1. Pp. 15-21.

9. Sun Y., Jansen-Verbeke M., Min Q., Cheng S. Tourism Potential of Agricultural Heritage Systems // Tour- ism Geographies. 2011. Vol.13. No.1. Pp. 112-128. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2010.516400.

10. Sun Y., Min Q., Cheng S., Zhong L.,Qi X. Study on the tourism resource characteristics of agricultural her- itage. Tourism tribune. 2010. Vol.25. No.10. Pp. 57-62.

11. Vafadari K. Exploring Tourism Potential of Agricultural Heritage Systems // Issues in Social Science. 2013. Vol.1. No.1. Pp. 33-52. DOI:10.5296/iss.v1i1.4465.

12. Vafadari K. Planning Sustainable tourism for Agricultural Heritage Landscapes // Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies. 2012. No.32. Pp. 75-89.

13. Wang L., Cheng S., Zhong L., Mu S., Dhruba B., Ren G. Rural Tourism Development in China: Principles, Models and the Future // Journal of Mountain Science. 2013. Vol.10. No.1. Pp. 116-129. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2501-3.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?