A combined analysis of geomagnetic data and cosmic ray secondaries for the September 2017 space weather event studies

Sidorov Roman; Соловьев Анатолий Александрович; Gvishiani Alexei; Getmanov Viktor; Mandea Mioara; Petrukhin Anatoly; Yashin Igor; Obraztsov Alexander

doi:doi:10.2205/2019ES000671

A combined analysis of geomagnetic data and cosmic ray secondaries for the September 2017 space weather event studies

Опубликовано в Russian Journal of Earth Sciences · Том 19, Номер 4, 2019 · Рубрики: ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ

DOI 10.2205/2019ES000671

Получено: 25.08.2019 Одобрено: 25.08.2019 Опубликовано: 25.08.2019 Язык публикаций: ENG

Авторы

Sidorov Roman ¹ · Соловьев Анатолий Александрович ² iD · Gvishiani Alexei ³ · Getmanov Viktor ⁴ · Mandea Mioara ⁵ · Petrukhin Anatoly ⁶ · Yashin Igor ⁷ · Obraztsov Alexander ⁸

1 Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences

2 Геофизический центр РАН
, Институт физики Земли им. О. Ю. Шмидта РАН
Москва, Россия

3 Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences

4 Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences

5 Centre National d'Études Spatiales

6 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI

7 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI

8 Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences

АННОТАЦИЯ

The September 2017 solar flares and the subsequent geomagnetic storms driven by the coronal mass ejections were recognized as the ones of the most powerful space weather events during the current solar cycle. The occurrence of the most powerful solar flares and magnetic storms during the declining phase of a solar cycle is a common phenomenon, and the current cycle is no exception. Nowadays, thorough and multifactor space weather monitoring is required to prevent the damages from the destructive space weather impact on the technological systems on the Earth. The purpose of this study is to better characterize these events by applying the generalized characteristic function approach for combined analysis of geomagnetic activity indices, total electron content data and secondary cosmic ray data from the muon hodoscope that contained Forbush decreases resulting from solar plasma impacts. A combined analysis of secondary cosmic ray data from the muon hodoscope, geomagnetic activity indices and total electron content data is presented. The main advantage of this approach is the possibility to identify low-amplitude specific features in datasets characterizing several environmental sources. As an example, different datasets available over the storm period 6-11 September 2017 were analyzed in a unified way. The new developed technique allows us to study various space weather effects and obtain new mutually supportive information on different phases of storm evolution, based on the geomagnetic and other environmental observations in the near-Earth space.

КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА

Space weather events magnetic storms and substorms muon flux instruments and techniques generalized characteristic functions

Информация Текст Литература

Авторы:

1. Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences

2. Геофизический центр РАН

Институт физики Земли им. О. Ю. Шмидта РАН

Москва, Россия

3. Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences

4. Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences

5. Centre National d'Études Spatiales

6. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI

7. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI

8. Geophysical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences

Тип:

Статья

Страницы:

с по

Статус:

Опубликован

Язык материала:

английский

Ключевые слова:

Space weather events, magnetic storms and substorms, muon flux, instruments and techniques, generalized characteristic functions

Финансирование

The results presented in this paper rely on data collected at the INTERMAGNET magnetic observatories. We express our gratitude to the national institutes that support them and the INTERMAGNET community for promoting the high standards of magnetic observatory practice (http://www.intermag net.org). We also acknowledge URAGAN muon hodoscope data provided by the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, and total electron content data provided by IZMIRAN ionosphere weather portal. This work employed facilities and data provided by the Shared Research Facility "Analytical Geomagnetic Data Center" of the Geophysical Center of RAS (http://ckp.gcras. ru/). The research has been conducted in the framework of the Russian Science Foundation project No. 17-17-01215.

Текст

Текст (PDF): Читать Скачать

Список литературы

1. Astapov, I. I., N. S. Barbashina, V. V. Borog, I. S. Veselovskii, N. V. Osetrova, A. A. Petrukhin, V. V. Shutenko, I. I. Yashin (2017), Investigation of geoeffective and non-geoeffective CMEs according to data from the URAGAN muon hodoscope, B. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 81, no. 2, p. 183-186, https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873817020046. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVKNDX

2. Balogh, A., H. S. Hudson, K. Petrovay, et al. (2014), Introduction to the Solar Activity Cycle: Overview of Causes and Consequences, Space Sci. Rev., 186, p. 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0125-8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/URTTEZ

3. Barbashina, N. S., R. P. Kokoulin, K. G. Kompaniets, et al. (2008), The URAGAN wide-aperture large-area muon hodoscope, Instrum. Exp. Tech., 51, no. 2, p. 180-186, https://doi.org/10.1134/S002044120802005X. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVCBSU

4. Barbashina, N. S., I. I. Astapov, T. A. Belyakova, et al. (2017), Muon flux variations detected by the URAGAN muon hodoscope during thunderstorms, B. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 81, no. 2, p. 230-233, https://doi.org/10.3103/S106287381702006X. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVEEER

5. Cane, H. V. (2000), Coronal Mass Ejections and Forbush Decreases, Space Sci. Rev., 93, no. 55, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026532125747.

6. De Haro, B. F. Barbás, V. H. Ríos, Gómez} {A. , Santillán M. Pérez (2002), Variations of total electron content during a magnetic storm, Geofís. Int., 41, no. 1, p. 49-55.

7. De Smith, M. J. (2015), STATSREF: Statistical Analysis Handbook - A Web-Based Statistics Resource, The Winchelsea Press, Winchelsea, UK.

8. Garner, T. W., T. L. Gaussiran II, B. W. Tolman, R. B. Harris, R. S. Calfas, H. Gallagher (2008), Total electron content measurements in ionospheric physics, Adv. Space Res., 42, p. 720-726, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.02.025.

9. Getmanov, V. G., R. V. Sidorov, R. A. Dabagyan (2015), A method of filtering signals using local models and weighted averaging functions, Meas. Tech., 58, p. 1029-1036, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-015-0837-5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WQPLCX

10. Gvishiani, A., A. Soloviev, R. Krasnoperov, R. Lukianova (2016a), Automated hardware and software system for monitoring the Earth's magnetic environment, Data Science Journal, 15, p. 18, https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2016-018. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XVKHMB

11. Gvishiani, A. D., R. V. Sidorov, R. Yu. Lukianova, A. A. Soloviev (2016b), Geomagnetic activity during St. Patrick's Day storm inferred from global and local indicators, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 16, p. ES6007, https://doi.org/10.2205/2016ES000593. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XESXXN

12. Hmelevskoy, V. K. (1999), Geophysical Methods of a Research of Crust: Manual, Book 2, 184 pp., International University of the Nature, Society and Person, Dubna (in Russian).

13. Loewe, C. A., G. W. Prölss (1997), Classification and mean behavior of magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 102, no. A7, p. 14,209-14,213, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA04020. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WXDDFY

14. Mandea, M., M. Purucker (2018), The Varying Core Magnetic Field from a Space Weather Perspective, Space Sci. Rev., 214, p. 11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0443-8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YFCGFF

15. Mikhaylenko, A. S., N.V. Ampilogov, N.S. Barbashina, et al. (2011), Studying variations of muon flux on the Earth's surface, based on muon hodoscope data during nonstationary atmospheric processes, B. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 75, no. 6, p. 827-830, https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873811060323. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OHQUPH

16. Nikitin, A. A. (1979), Statistical Methods for Distinguishing Geophysical Anomalies, 280 pp., Nedra, Moscow (in Russian).

17. Nikitin, A. A. (1986), Theoretical Basis for Processing Geophysical Information: Textbook, 342 pp., Nedra, Moscow (in Russian).

18. Parker, E. N. (1958), Dynamics of the interplanetary gas and magnetic fields, Astrophys. J., 128, p. 664-676, https://doi.org/10.1086/146579.

19. Solanki, S. K. (2003), Sunspots: An overview, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 11, no. 2-3, p. 153-286, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-003-0018-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RRAPUP

20. Struminsky, A. B., I. V. Zimovetz (2010), Observations of the December 6, 2006 solar flare: Electron acceleration and plasma heating, Astron. Lett., 36, p. 430, https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377371006006X. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MXECHV

21. Troyan, V., Yu. Kiselev (2010), Statistical Methods of Geophysical Data Processing, 456 pp., World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1142/7608. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WWHODL

22. Usoskin, I. G. (2017), A history of solar activity over millennia, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 14, p. 3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YYFBNH

23. Xu, Sh., E. Thiemann, D. Mitchell, et al. (2018), Observations and Modeling of the Mars Low-Altitude Ionospheric Response to the 10 September 2017 X-Class Solar Flare, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, p. 15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078524. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YKLGPJ

24. Zolotukhina, N., N. Polekh, V. I. Kurkin, D. Rogov, E. Romanova, M. Chelpanov (2017), Ionospheric effects of St. Patrick's storm over Asian Russia: 17-19 March 2015: Ionospheric effects over Russia, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 122, p. 2484-2504, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023180. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVFIFV

A combined analysis of geomagnetic data and cosmic ray secondaries for the September 2017 space weather event studies

Подтверждение

Регистрация