Ufa, Ufa, Russian Federation
Ufa, Ufa, Russian Federation
Ufa, Ufa, Russian Federation
Ufa, Ufa, Russian Federation
BISAC MAT029020 Probability & Statistics / Multivariate Analysis
Currently, the problem of organizing a municipal solid waste management system (MSW) has become more acute in Russian regions and all over the world. Various environmental and economic problems, as well as problems related to public health negatively affect many aspects of the development of modern society. Therefore, the careful organization of the management of the MSW management system is of great social importance and needs constant improvement. In this paper, we look at the MSW management system from the point of various scientific approaches, namely, structural analysis methods, geoinformation technology methods, reliability theory for complex technical systems, evergetics, graph theory and fuzzy logic methods, including the apparatus of linguistic variables. The purpose of the work is to show the possibility of application and systematic combination of the above scientific methods that have proven themselves well in their fields to a new area of the MSW management systems. However, just application of these approaches is impossible without their further adaptation and systematization from the point of view of existing approaches to the management of similar systems. As part of this study, elements of the MSW management system were identified and a topological model of the system was developed. Structural-logical models of reliability at various levels of abstraction were also built.
waste recycling, municipal solid waste, geographic information systems, evergetics, reliability theory, linguistic variables
1. Kosolapov N. A. Statistics on MSW in Russia // Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal “Concept”. 2014.Vol. 26.S. 581–585.
2. G. Druzhinin. Reliability of automated systems. Ed. 3rd, rev. and add. M., "Energy", 1977. 536 p.
3. Parkinson D.B. Parameter Design in System Reliability // Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, Volume 3, 2006 - Issue 1, pp. 93-102, DOI: 10.1080 / 16843703.2006.11673102
4. Lin Y.-K., Kuo P.-H., Chang C.-C. System reliability for joint minimal paths under time constraint // Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Volume 37, 2014 - Issue 1, pp. 110-121, DOI: 10.1080 / 02533839.2012.747250
5. Chavaillaz A., Sauer J. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation // Ergonomics, Volume 60, 2017 - Issue 9, pp. 1261-1272, DOI: 10.1080 / 00140139.2016.1261187
6. BowTieXP. The next generation BowTie methodology tool. BowTie Methodology Manual. Revision 15. (Mar 27, 2015). 64 p.
7. TRIPOD BETA. Guidance on using Tripod Beta in the investigation and analysis of incidents, accidents and business losses. February 2015. Version 5.01. 92 p.
8. Wittich V.A. Inhomogeneous actor and everyday life as the key concepts of evergetics: preprint - Samara: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute for Problems of Management of Complex Systems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014. - 12 p.
9. Rastrigin L. A. Adaptation of complex systems. Riga: Zinatne, 1981. 375 p.
10. Tskhovrebov E.S., Velichko E.G. Scientific and methodological approaches to creating a model of an integrated system for managing the flow of construction waste // Vestnik MGSU. 2015. No 9. P. 95-110
11. Reimers N.F. Nature management. Dictionary. M.: Thought, 1990.637 s
12. Mikhailov N.I. Physical and geographical zoning. M .: Publishing house of Moscow State University, 1985.
13. Shcherbatov I.A., Protalinsky O.M. Complex, poorly formalized multicomponent technical systems // Management of large systems: proceedings. 2013. No. 45. S. 30-46.
14. Kuj S.A. The multidimensional nature of the consideration of complex systems // Prospects for science and education. 2014. No. 1 (7). S. 38-43.
15. Miroshnik IV, Nikiforov V.O., Fradkov A.L. Non-linear and adaptive control of complex dynamic systems. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000.549 s.
16. Synergetic management methods for complex systems / A. A. Kolesnikov [et al.]; under the general. ed. A.A. Kolesnikova. M .: URSS, 2006.300 s.
17. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000; 320: 768–70. DOI: 10.1136 / bmj.320.7237.768.
18. Reason J. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 1997.
19. Velmozhin A. V. Theory of transport processes and systems: a textbook for high schools / A. V. Velmozhin, V. A. Gudkov, L. B. Mirotin. M .: Transport, 1998.167 s.
20. Gvozdev V.E., Khristodulo O.I. Information support for decision making in waste management tasks based on mathematical-geoinformation modeling // Information Technologies. 2019.Vol. 25. No. 8. P. 482-489.
21. Gvozdev V.E., Khristodulo O.I., Sazonova T.V., Fakhretdinova E.B. The use of technologies of geographic information and mathematical modeling to assess the validity of the choice of location of waste processing enterprises // Auditorium. 2018. No. 3 (19). S. 63-72.
22. C. Enrique Pelaz, John B. Bowles. Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a System Model for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis // INFORMATION SCIENCES 88, 177-199 (1996).
