Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The paper attempts to assess the impact of levels and forms of education of employed workers on the level of per capita production based on econometric methods using Rosstat data. It has been established that in regions with a high level of per capita GRP, the use of labor of workers with higher education and secondary vocational education in programs for training mid-level specialists has a positive effect on the value of GRP. The use of labor of workers with secondary vocational education in programs for training skilled workers and employees with basic general education has a negative effect on the value of GRP. In regions with an average level of per capita GRP, the use of labor of workers with various levels and forms of education does not have a significant effect on the level of per capita GRP. In regions with a low level of per capita GRP, only the use of labor of workers with secondary vocational education in programs for training skilled workers and employees has a significant positive effect on the value of GRP. This can be explained by the fact that the country's economy combines the spread of both industrial and post-industrial technological structures.
levels of education, forms of education, per capita GRP, industrial economy, post-industrial economy, econometrics
1. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Postindustrial’nye uklady v jekonomike Rossii [Post-industrial structures in the Russian economy]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2017. 159 p. (in Russian)
2. Glaz'ev S. Strategija operezhajushhego razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki v uslovijah global'nogo krizisa [The strategy of the advanced development of the Russian economy in the global crisis]. Moscow, Jekonomika Publ. 2010. 287 p.
3. Perez, C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages [Text] / C. Perez. — Elgar Publishing, 2003. — 224 p.
4. Maevskij V. Vvedenie v jevoljucionnuju makrojekonomiku [Introduction to evolutionary macroeconomics]. Moscow, Japonija segodnja Publ. 1997, p. 106.
5. Basovskaya E., Basovskiy L. Efficiency of Technological Modes in the Economy of the United Kingdom. Ekonomika [Economics]. 2015, V. 3, I. 6, pp. 13-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/16671 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VSHMMT
6. Leontief, W. Essays in Economics: Theories, Theorizing, Facts, and Policies Paperback [Text] / W. Leontief. — Transaction Publishers, 1985. — 423 p.
7. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1942. 381.
8. Amaraev B.A., Marshova T.N. Investicionnye processy i strukturnaja perestrojka rossijskoj jekonomiki [Investment processes and restructuring of the Russian economy]. Voprosy jekonomiki [Economic issues], 2017. №12. P. 40-62. (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-12-40-62; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZVGEFN
9. Ivashhenko S.M. Istochniki dolgosrochnogo rosta sektorov rossijskoj jekono-miki [Sources of long-term growth of sectors of the Russian economy]. Zhurnal novoj jekonomicheskoj associacii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2020. №4. P. 86-112. (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-48-4-4; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJEEYV
10. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Razvitie v Rossii jekonomki neravenstva [Development in the Russian housekeeper inequality]. Zhurnal jekonomicheskoj teorii [Journal of Economic Theory]. 2011. No. 4. P. 198–202. (in Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOYIZJ
