In the present review modern data on uterine artery embolization for treatment of uterine fibroid is summarized. Treatment outcomes and safety concerns are discussed. The special attention is turned on impact of uterine artery embolization for radiation safety and acceptability of this method of treatment in patients of young reproductive age. In 2013, on the basis of separation and angiographic studies rentgenoperatsionnyh Gause RCH №2 Opti-mization catheterization technique of uterine artery embolization to reduce the dose of ionizing radiation patients and reduce the time of the endovascular intervention. The article concludes that the proposed modified technique of endovascular intervention includes all the positive sides used today endovascular techniques for the UAE and has a number of advantages associated with an increase in the radiation safety of patients. Using a modified technique of uterine artery catheterization when the UAE, led primarily to a reduction in fluoroscopy time and the operation as a whole, had a positive impact on reducing radiation exposure to patients, which is extremely important for women of childbearing age with unrealized reproductive function.
uterine fibroid, uterine artery embolization, radiation safety.
1. Bilan M.N., Kozyura O.P. Embolizatsiya matochnykh arteriy pri mnome matkn: osobennosti kateterizatsnonnoy tekhniki . Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal interventsionnoy kardioangiologii. 2004. № 4. S. 43-46.
2. Blinov N.N., Zelikman M.I. Rentgendiagnosticheskaya apparatura posle 2000 goda: Maksimum informativnosti pri minimume dozovykh nagruzok. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopas-nost´. 1999. №1. S. 6-8.
3. Kapranov S.A., Bobrov B.Yu. Vliyanie tekhnicheskikh i anatomicheskikh faktorov na effektiv-nost´ embolizatsii matochnykh arteriy. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2006. N 2. S. 51-56.
4. Keirim-Markus I.B. Eshche o reglamentatsii oblucheniya cheloveka . Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost´. 2000. №3. S. 41-44.
5. Meditsinskaya rentgenologiya: tekhnicheskie aspekty, klinicheskie materialy, radiatsionnaya bezopasnost´. Red. Stavitskiy R.V. M.: MNPI, 2003.
6. Adrews R.T., Brown P.H. Uterine arterial embolization: factors influencing patient radiation expo-sure. Radiologi 2000. Vol. 217. S. 713-722.
7. Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization / Nikolik B., Abbara S., Levy E., [et al.]// JVIR 2000. Vol.11. P. 1173-1178.
8. Nikolik B., Spies J.B., Campbell L., et al. Uterine arteri embolization: reduced radiation with refined technigue. J vasc interv radiol. 2001. Vol. 12(1). P. 39-44.
9. Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery emboli-zation / Nikolic B., Spies J.B., Lundsten M.J. [et al.]. Radiology. 2000. Vol. 214. P. 121-125.
10. Society of Interventional Radiology. Uterine Artery Embolization Survey: 10,500 Procedures Per-formed Worldwide. Fairfax, VA: Society of Interventional Radiology, 2000.
11. Training standards for physicians performing uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata / Spies J.B., Niedzwiecki G., Goodwin S. [et al.]. J.Vasc.Interv.Radiol. 2001. Vol.12. P. 19-21.
12. Wagner L.K., Archer B.R., Cohen A.M. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J.Vasc.Interv.Radiol. 2000. Vol.11. P. 25-33. Walker W.J., Pelage J.P., Sutton C. Fibroid embolization. Clin Radiol. 2002. Vol. 57. P. 325-331.
