Legal framework as a means of effective communication between the investigator and the body of inquiry (through the example of internal affairs bodies)

Nadezhda Loginova; Lyubov&#039; Abramova

doi:doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2021-4-111-120

VAK Russia 12.00.09 UDC 343

Legal framework as a means of effective communication between the investigator and the body of inquiry (through the example of internal affairs bodies)

Published в Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2021, Issue 4, 2021 · Pages 111–120 · Rubrics: Criminal process

DOI 10.35750/2071-8284-2021-4-111-120

Received: 24.09.2021 Accepted: 20.12.2021 Published: 20.12.2021 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Nadezhda Loginova ¹ iD · Lyubov' Abramova ² iD

1 Siberian Federal University (Department of Criminal Procedure, docent)
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

2 Siberian Law Institute of the MIA of Russia (Department of Criminal Procedure, deputy chief of department of Criminal Procedure)
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

Based on the conducted research the authors concluded that there are regulatory legal acts regulating the issues of interaction between the investigator and the body of inquiry, which in addition to the criminal procedural law include other laws and by-laws, in particular, the federal laws “On operative-investigative activity”, “On the police”, departmental orders and instructions. It is noted that the existing disputes about the legality, procedure, types and subjects of interaction, about the procedural nature and evidential significance of information obtained from interaction, about the methods of its registration demonstrate the imperfection of the current regulatory framework in this area, which prevents its effective enforcement. The article indicates that the gaps in legislation in some of the most significant areas of intervention in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs have been filled through regulatory legal acts issued both at the federal level of the department and the level of territorial internal affairs bodies (in the form of orders, decrees, instructions and etc.), which certainly allowed to solve a number of practical problems. The authors of the publication make proposals for improving the legislative regulation of the procedural status of the body of inquiry as a participant in a criminal process.

KEYWORDS

investigator the body of inquiry legal framework criminal procedural law legal regulation regulatory legal act bodies conducting operative-investigative activity operational subdivisions

Information Text References

Authors:

1. Siberian Federal University (Department of Criminal Procedure, docent)

Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

2. Siberian Law Institute of the MIA of Russia (Department of Criminal Procedure, deputy chief of department of Criminal Procedure)

Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 111 to 120

Status:

Published

Subject area:

VAK Russia 12.00.09
UDC 343

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

investigator, the body of inquiry, legal framework, criminal procedural law, legal regulation, regulatory legal act, bodies conducting operative-investigative activity, operational subdivisions

Text

Text (PDF): Read Download

References

1. Viktorov B. A. Pravovye osnovy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1979. - 159 s.

2. Kosimov O. A. Pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya s organami doznaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2010. - № 23. - S. 2-5.

3. Plesneva L. P. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya s organami doznaniya: pravovye i organizacionnye osnovy : monografiya. - Irkutsk : VSI MVD Rossii, 2016. - S. 17-19.

4. Fadeev I. A. Pravovye osnovy organizacii vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya i operativnogo sotrudnika policii // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 10-13.

5. Lipka E. S. Pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya s uchastnikami sledstvenno-operativnoy gruppy pri osmotre mesta proisshestviya // Zakon i pravo. - 2012. - № 4. - S. 86-87.

6. Nechaev V. V. Organizacionno-pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya i doznaniya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2007. - 200 s.

7. Michurina O. V. Reglamentiruet li UPK RF policiyu v kachestve organa doznaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2012. - № 2. - S. 87-89.

8. Kruglikov A. P. O ponyatii i sisteme form vzaimodeystviya sledovateley i organov doznaniya v processe rassledovaniya i raskrytiya prestupleniy // Uspehi sovremennoy nauki. - 2017. - T. 7. - № 3. - S. 192-194.

9. Meretukov G. M. Osobennosti vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya i organa doznaniya na pervonachal'nom etape rassledovaniya prestupleniya o narkobiznese. - Krasnodar: Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1992. - 38 s.

10. Danil'yan A. S., Danil'yan E. S. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya i operupolnomochennogo pri rassledovanii prestupleniy korrupcionnoy napravlennosti // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2014. - № 2 (24). - S. 55-58.

11. Pautova T. A., Verhoturova S. V. Voprosy pravovoy reglamentacii porucheniy sledovatelya, doznavatelya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. - 2018. - № 2 (44). - S. 101-107.

Legal framework as a means of effective communication between the investigator and the body of inquiry (through the example of internal affairs bodies)

Confirmation

Регистрация