COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CORRESPONDENCE MATRICES
Rubrics: CONSTRUCTION AND TRANSPORT
Authors:
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 181
to 182
Status:
Published
Received:
12.05.2021
Accepted:
14.01.2023
Published:
10.01.2022
Subject area:
GRNTI 73.01 Общие вопросы транспорта
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
correspondence matrices, transport planning, models
Abstract (English):
The study is aimed at comparing the methods of restoring correspondence matrices, the traditional transport school and modern mobile technologies. Traditionally, correspondence matrices are restored by interviewing vehicle drivers and applying gravity models (to extrapolate and fill in unobserved movements), then matrix estimation methods are used to calculate traffic flows. Each of these approaches has a number of advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence to assess the quality of the data obtained.
The study is aimed at comparing the methods of restoring correspondence matrices, the traditional transport school and modern mobile technologies. Traditionally, correspondence matrices are restored by interviewing vehicle drivers and applying gravity models (to extrapolate and fill in unobserved movements), then matrix estimation methods are used to calculate traffic flows. Each of these approaches has a number of advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence to assess the quality of the data obtained.
Keywords:
correspondence matrices, transport planning, models
correspondence matrices, transport planning, models
1. Toloueia R, Psarrasa S, Prince R. Origin-Destination Trip Matrix Development: Conventional Methods versus Mobile Phone Data // Transportation Research Procedia 26, 2017. – pp. 39–52.
2. Lebedeva O.A., Kripak M.N. Modelirovanie gruzovyh perevozok v transportnoy seti // Vestnik Angarskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2016. № 10. S. 182–184
